Advanced Search
Welcome to the Systematic
Review Data Repository
Welcome to the Systematic Review Data Repository
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) is a powerful and easy-to-use tool for the extraction and management of data for systematic review or meta-analysis. It is also an open and searchable archive of systematic reviews and their data.

New courses offered through Evidence Synthesis Academy! These short courses are focused on methods and best practices to improve the quality and efficiency of conducting systematic reviews, as well as advanced methods to maximize the use of available clinical data. Register for our first course on Preparing Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Journal Publication via our website
The Evidence Synthesis Academy, an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ 1R25HS023299-01) funded program within the Center for Evidence-based Medicine at Brown University School of Public Health.
To contribute data or comment on deposited projects, simply Register for an account.


Registered users, log in below:
Forgot Password?

Recently Completed and Deposited Reports Data

Diet-Related Fibers and Human Health Outcomes, Version 1 (retired version)


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 868 Studies, 1 Key Question, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Apr 27, 2015 09:35PM
Description: The objectives of this database are to: 1. Systematically compile and provide access to primary, English-language, peer-reviewed science linking dietary fiber intake in humans to one or more of 9 potential health benefits 2. Provide researchers with a tool to understand how different fibers are characterized in studies 3. Facilitate researchers in identifying gaps in the current research 4. Create a database to serve as a starting foundation of primary human literature for conducting evidence-based reviews and meta-analyses 5. Efficiently assist researchers in identifying fibers of interest This database should serve as a foundation for future work. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, detailed in the user manual, were applied in determining database eligibility; thus, this database is not intended to serve as a sole source for identifying all possible fiber literature for the purposes of conducting a meta-analysis or systematic review. This database contains Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) data to help users formulate and narrow the focus of their research question. It is expected that secondary searches will be conducted to augment this database.

Phenotypes and body mass in women with PCOS identified in Referral vs. Unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 36 Studies, 2 Key Questions, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Jan 23, 2015 09:08PM
Description: Objective: To compare the prevalence of PCOS phenotypes and obesity of PCOS women seen in the clinical (referred, biased) setting vs. those identified in (unselected, unbiased) studies.

Diet-Related Fibers and Human Health Outcomes, Version 2


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 919 Studies, 1 Key Question, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Jan 05, 2016 03:08PM
Description: The objectives of this database are to: 1. Systematically compile and provide access to primary, English-language, peer-reviewed science linking dietary fiber intake in humans to one or more of 9 potential health benefits 2. Provide researchers with a tool to understand how different fibers are characterized in studies 3. Facilitate researchers in identifying gaps in the current research 4. Create a database to serve as a starting foundation of primary human literature for conducting evidence-based reviews and meta-analyses 5. Efficiently assist researchers in identifying fibers of interest This database should serve as a foundation for future work. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, detailed in the user manual, were applied in determining database eligibility; thus, this database is not intended to serve as a sole source for identifying all possible fiber literature for the purposes of conducting a meta-analysis or systematic review. This database contains Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) data to help users formulate and narrow the focus of their research question. It is expected that secondary searches will be conducted to augment this database.

Nonpharmacological Versus Pharmacological Treatments for Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder - Medication Strategies


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 4 Studies, 4 Key Questions, 4 Extraction Forms,
Date Created: Feb 12, 2016 01:02AM
Description: Comparison of the benefits and harms of second-generation antidepressants (SGAs), psychological treatment options as first-step interventions for adult outpatients with acute -phase major depressive disorder (MDD), and as second-step interventions for patients with MDD who did not achieve remission after a first treatment attempt with SGAs.

Critical Analysis of the Evidence Safety in Nursing Home Settings


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 26 Studies, 4 Key Questions, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Jan 28, 2016 02:11PM
Description: Resident safety issues are common in nursing homes. Relevant literature reports a range of poor clinical outcomes thought to be preventable if specific care processes were consistently implemented. The goal of this project was to summarize relevant literature, including identifying safety issues and contextual factors that affect safety in nursing homes; potential hospital safety interventions of relevance to nursing homes; literature on safety interventions evaluated in nursing homes; barriers and facilitators of interventions; and future directions for safety research in this setting.

Nonpharmacological Versus Pharmacological Treatments for Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder - Exercise Interventions


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 2 Studies, 9 Key Questions, 3 Extraction Forms,
Date Created: Jan 19, 2016 08:03PM
Description: Comparison of the benefits and harms of second-generation antidepressants (SGAs), psychological treatment options as first-step interventions for adult outpatients with acute -phase major depressive disorder (MDD), and as second-step interventions for patients with MDD who did not achieve remission after a first treatment attempt with SGAs.



Creative Commons LicenseThis graphic notice indicates that you are leaving this Federal Government Web site and entering a non-Federal Web site. Creative Commons  
The data contained in this project are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical license, which permits the use, dissemination, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and that the use is non-commercial and otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Popular Resources



Help


SRDR Announcements


 

Statistics



Maintenance Schedule