Advanced Search
Welcome to the Systematic
Review Data Repository
Welcome to the Systematic Review Data Repository
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) is a powerful and easy-to-use tool for the extraction and management of data for systematic review or meta-analysis. It is also an open and searchable archive of systematic reviews and their data.
To contribute data or comment on deposited projects, simply Register for an account.


Registered users, log in below:
Forgot Password?

Recently Completed and Deposited Reports Data

Diet and PA for Prevention of Diabetes-Full Data Extraction


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 50 Studies, 1 Key Question, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Feb 12, 2013 04:22PM
Description: None Provided

Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children and Adolescents


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 90 Studies, 3 Key Questions, 2 Extraction Forms,
Date Created: Jul 13, 2017 02:15PM
Description: Objectives. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common pediatric neurobehavioral disorder often treated in the primary care setting. This systematic review updates and extends two previous systematic evidence reviews and focuses on the comparative effectiveness of methods to establish the diagnosis of ADHD, updates the comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, and evaluates different monitoring strategies in the primary care setting for individuals from birth through 17 years of age. Data sources. We searched PubMed®, Embase®, PsycINFO® and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant English-language studies published from January 1, 2011, through November 7, 2016. Review methods. Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion, abstracted the data, and performed quality ratings and evidence grading. Random-effects models were used to compute summary estimates of effects when sufficient data were available for meta-analysis.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Clinical Utility in Asthma Management


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 171 Studies, 1 Key Question, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Aug 22, 2017 02:55PM
Description: To evaluate the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in people age 5 years and older with asthma; and the ability of FeNO measured at age 4 years or younger to predict a future diagnosis of asthma. PubMed ID:

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Clinical Utility in Asthma Management


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 171 Studies, 1 Key Question, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Aug 22, 2017 02:55PM
Description: To evaluate the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in people age 5 years and older with asthma; and the ability of FeNO measured at age 4 years or younger to predict a future diagnosis of asthma. PubMed ID:

The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Asthma


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 130 Studies, 4 Key Questions, 2 Extraction Forms,
Date Created: Jul 25, 2017 04:15PM
Description: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in the treatment of allergic asthma

Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children and Adolescents


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 90 Studies, 3 Key Questions, 2 Extraction Forms,
Date Created: Jul 13, 2017 02:15PM
Description: Objectives. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common pediatric neurobehavioral disorder often treated in the primary care setting. This systematic review updates and extends two previous systematic evidence reviews and focuses on the comparative effectiveness of methods to establish the diagnosis of ADHD, updates the comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, and evaluates different monitoring strategies in the primary care setting for individuals from birth through 17 years of age. Data sources. We searched PubMed®, Embase®, PsycINFO® and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant English-language studies published from January 1, 2011, through November 7, 2016. Review methods. Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion, abstracted the data, and performed quality ratings and evidence grading. Random-effects models were used to compute summary estimates of effects when sufficient data were available for meta-analysis.



Creative Commons LicenseThis graphic notice indicates that you are leaving this Federal Government Web site and entering a non-Federal Web site. Creative Commons  
The data contained in this project are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical license, which permits the use, dissemination, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and that the use is non-commercial and otherwise in compliance with the license. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Popular Resources



Help


SRDR Announcements


 

Statistics



Maintenance Schedule