Advanced Search
Welcome to the Systematic
Review Data Repository
Welcome to the Systematic Review Data Repository
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) is a powerful and easy-to-use tool for the extraction and management of data for systematic review or meta-analysis. It is also an open and searchable archive of systematic reviews and their data.
To contribute data or comment on deposited projects, simply Register for an account.


Registered users, log in below:
Forgot Password?

Recently Completed and Deposited Reports Data

SRDR Project Indexing


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 135 Studies, 1 Key Question, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: May 20, 2018 11:24PM
Description: This is a Methods Research project that catalogs the various projects with publicly available data on the SRDR Webpage.

Physiologic Predictors of Severe Injury: Systematic Review [Entered Retrospectively]


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 138 Studies, 3 Key Questions, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Mar 09, 2018 10:11PM
Description: Objectives. To systematically identify and summarize evaluations of measures of circulatory and respiratory compromise, focusing on measures that can be used in field assessment by emergency medical services to inform decisions about the level of trauma care needed. We identified research on the ability of different measures to predict whether a patient was seriously injured and thus required transport to the highest level of trauma care available. Data sources. We searched Ovid MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane databases from 1996 through August 2017. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed for additional relevant citations. Review methods. We included studies of individual measures and measures that combined circulatory, respiratory, and level of consciousness assessment. Evaluations included diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). We used data provided to calculate values that were not reported and pooled estimates across studies when feasible. Results. We identified and included 138 articles reporting results of 134 studies. Circulatory compromise measures evaluated in these studies included systolic blood pressure, heart rate, shock index, lactate, base deficit, and heart rate variability or complexity. The respiratory measures evaluated included respiration rate, oxygen saturation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and need for airway support. Many different combination measures were identified, but most were evaluated in only one or two studies. Pooled AUROCs from out-of-hospital data were 0.67 for systolic blood pressure (moderate strength of evidence); 0.67 for heart rate, 0.72 for shock index, 0.77 for lactate, 0.70 for respiratory rate, and 0.89 for Revised Trauma Score combination measure (all low strength of evidence); and were considered poor to fair. The only AUROC that reached a level considered excellent was for the Glasgow Coma Scale, age, and arterial pressure (GAP) combination measure (AUROC, 0.96; estimate based on emergency department data). All of the measures had low sensitivities and comparatively high specificities (e.g., sensitivities ranging from 13% to 74% and specificities ranging from 62% to 96% for out-of-hospital pooled estimates). Conclusions. Physiologic measures usable in triaging trauma patients have been evaluated in multiple studies; however, their predictive utilities are moderate and far from ideal. Overall, the measures have low sensitivities, high specificities, and AUROCs in the poor-to-fair range. Combination measures that include assessments of consciousness seem to perform better, but whether they are feasible and valuable for out-of-hospital use needs to be determined. Modification of triage measures for children or older adults is needed, given that the measures perform worse in these age groups; however, research has not yet conclusively identified modifications that result in better performance.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes after Bariatric Surgery in the Medicare Population


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 83 Studies, 5 Key Questions, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Mar 23, 2017 02:38PM
Description: We conducted a technology assessment to summarize and appraise the current evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery in the Medicare-eligible population.

Management of Infertility


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 151 Studies, 7 Key Questions, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Jan 09, 2019 05:11PM
Description: Objective. Previous studies have demonstrated varying success for treatment of infertility. Much of this literature however does not focus on treatment of women with specific diagnoses. This systematic review evaluated the comparative effectiveness and safety of fertility treatment strategies for (a) women of reproductive age (18-44) who are infertile due to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, unknown reasons, or tubal or peritoneal factors or (b) couples with male factor infertility; and evaluated short- and long-term health outcomes of gamete donors in infertility. Data sources. We searched PubMed®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for English-language studies published from January 1, 2007, to October 3, 2018, that reported live birth rates, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, time to pregnancy, and short-term and long-term adverse outcomes for mothers and children born after infertility treatment. For male and female donors, we searched for studies reporting short- and long-term adverse effects and quality-of-life outcomes. Review methods. Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion; abstracted data; and performed quality ratings, applicability ratings, and evidence grading. Where appropriate, random-effects models were used to compute summary estimates of effects.

Telehealth for Acute and Chronic Care Consultations


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 216 Studies, 5 Key Questions, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Jan 04, 2019 11:05PM
Description: Objectives: To conduct a systematic review to identify and summarize the available evidence about the effectiveness of telehealth consultations and to explore using decision modeling techniques to supplement the review. Telehealth consultations are defined as the use of telehealth to facilitate collaboration between two or more providers, often involving a specialist, or among clinical team members, across time and/or distance. Consultations may focus on the prevention, assessment, diagnosis, and/or clinical management of acute or chronic conditions. Data Sources. We searched Ovid MEDLINE®, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL®) to identify studies published from 1996 to May 2018. We also reviewed reference lists of identified studies and systematic reviews, and we solicited published or unpublished studies through an announcement in the Federal Register. Data for the model came both from studies identified via the systematic review and from other sources. Methods. We included comparative studies that provided data on clinical, cost, or intermediate outcomes associated with the use of any technology to facilitate consultations for inpatient, emergency, or outpatient care. We rated studies for risk of bias and extracted information about the study design, the telehealth interventions, and results. We assessed the strength of evidence and synthesized the findings using quantitative and qualitative methods. An exploratory decision model was developed to assess the potential economic impact of telehealth consultations for traumatic brain injuries in adults. Results. The search yielded 9,366 potentially relevant citations. Upon review, 8,356 were excluded and the full text of 1,010 articles was pulled for review. Of these, 233 articles met our criteria and were included—54 articles evaluated inpatient consultations, 73 emergency care, and 106 outpatient care. The overall results varied by setting and clinical topic, but generally the findings are that telehealth improved outcomes or that there was no difference between telehealth and the comparators. Remote intensive care unit (ICU) consultations likely reduce ICU and total hospital mortality with no significant difference in ICU or hospital length of stay; specialty telehealth consultations likely reduce the time patients spend in the emergency department; telehealth for emergency medical services likely reduces mortality for patients with heart attacks, and remote consultations for outpatient care likely improve access and a range of clinical outcomes (moderate strength of evidence in favor of telehealth). Findings with lower confidence are that inpatient telehealth consultations may reduce length of stay and costs; telehealth consultations in emergency care may improve outcomes and reduce costs due to fewer transfers and also may reduce outpatient visits and costs due to less travel (low strength of evidence in favor of telehealth). Current evidence reports no difference in clinical outcomes with inpatient telehealth specialty consultations, no difference in mortality but also no difference in harms with telestroke consultations, and no difference in satisfaction with outpatient telehealth consultations (low strength of evidence of no difference). Too few studies reported information on potential harms from outpatient telehealth consultations for conclusions to be drawn (insufficient evidence). An exploratory cost model underscores the importance of perspective and assumptions in using modeling to extend evidence and the need for more detailed data on costs and outcomes when telehealth is used for consultations. For example, a model comparing telehealth to transfers and in-person neurosurgical consultations for acute traumatic brain injury identified that the impact of telehealth on costs may depend on multiple factors including how alternatives are organized (e.g., if the telehealth and in-person options are part of the same health care system) and whether the cost of a telehealth versus an in-person consultation differ. Conclusions. In general, the evidence indicates that telehealth consultations are effective in improving outcomes or providing services with no difference in outcomes; however, the evidence is stronger for some applications, and less strong or insufficient for others. Exploring the use of a cost model underscored that the economic impact of telehealth consultations depends on the perspective used in the analysis. The increase in both interest and investment in telehealth suggests the need to develop a research agenda that emphasizes rigor and focuses on standardized outcome comparisons that can inform policy and practice decisions.

Long-term Drug Therapy and Drug Holidays for Osteoporosis Fracture Prevention: A Systematic Review [Entered Retrospectively]


Public Report Complete
Statistics: 59 Studies, 8 Key Questions, 1 Extraction Form,
Date Created: Dec 04, 2018 09:34PM
Description: Objective. To summarize evidence on outcomes of long-term osteoporosis drug therapy to prevent fractures, on continuing versus discontinuing osteoporosis drug therapy (i.e., placebo drug holidays), and on whether osteoporosis drug intervention effects vary as a function of patient, bone, or drug characteristics. Data sources. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases from 1995 to June 2018; ClinicalTrials.gov; bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews Review methods. Long-term osteoporosis drug therapy was defined as >3 years and drug holiday as osteoporosis drug discontinuation for ≥1 year after ≥1 year of prior osteoporosis drug use. Two reviewers independently rated risk of bias (ROB) and strength of evidence (SOE), resolving discrepancies by consensus. Included studies were English-language trials for incident fractures and harms and controlled observational studies for additional harms outcomes. For low or medium ROB studies, one reviewer extracted data and a second verified accuracy. Results. Of 56 eligible publications, 44 had low or medium ROB, including 32 publications of trials (7 unique studies) and 12 publications of observational studies (10 unique studies). Nearly all studies were comprised of postmenopausal women. Mean participant age was 72 years; all but 2 studies had a mean age <80 years. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, compared with placebo, 4 years of alendronate or raloxifene reduced risk of incident vertebral fractures (high SOE), 4 years of alendronate reduced risk of incident clinical fractures (moderate SOE). In postmenopausal women with past fractures, compared with placebo, both long-term estrogen and long-term estrogen/progestin reduced risk of incident clinical fractures and long-term estrogen reduced risk of incident hip fractures (all low SOE). Alendronate, denosumab and raloxifene for 4 years each significantly increased total hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) versus placebo. Continuation versus discontinuation of alendronate after 5 years reduced risk of incident clinical vertebral fractures in one large trial (10 vs. 5 years, moderate SOE), but not in another smaller trial (7 vs. 5 years, low SOE). Continuation versus discontinuation of zoledronic acid (6 vs. 3 years) reduced risk of incident radiographic vertebral fractures (moderate SOE), but evidence was insufficient about risk of incident clinical vertebral fractures. Neither alendronate nor zoledronic acid continuation reduced risk of nonvertebral fractures (low SOE) versus discontinuation; for both, continuation was associated with generally stable hip BMD compared to small, but significant declines with discontinuation. Based primarily on observational studies, long-term bisphosphonates may increase risks of radiologically confirmed atypical femoral fractures (AFF), subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures without confirmed AFF features, and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Limitations. Minimal data for men or individuals with comorbidities. Low power to assess risks of incident clinical fractures. No data compared long-term effects of sequential treatments (e.g., anabolic followed by anti-resorptive) or different durations of drug holidays. Analyses of possible treatment effect modifiers almost entirely post hoc. Observational studies used variable drug treatment and control exposures and harms definitions. Conclusions. For postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by BMD or past fractures, long-term alendronate and raloxifene reduced risk of incident vertebral fractures; long-term alendronate, estrogen, and estrogen/progestin reduced risk of clinical fractures; and long-term estrogen reduces risk of incident hip fractures. Longer-term use of bisphosphonates versus discontinuation may lower vertebral fracture risk and stabilize hip BMD, but doesn’t reduce nonvertebral fracture risk and may increase risk of AFF and ONJ. Long-term estrogen and estrogen/progestin increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and long-term estrogen increased risk of dementia and breast cancer. To address remaining knowledge gaps, future trials and observational studies should enroll diverse populations (sex, comorbidity), examine the effects of sequential treatments and compare drug holidays of different durations, be powered for clinical fractures, and use standard AFF and ONJ definitions. A priori analyses to examine whether treatment outcomes vary by patient, bone and drug treatment characteristics may inform individualized treatment decisions.



Creative Commons LicenseThis graphic notice indicates that you are leaving this Federal Government Web site and entering a non-Federal Web site. Creative Commons  
The data contained in this project are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical license, which permits the use, dissemination, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and that the use is non-commercial and otherwise in compliance with the license. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Popular Resources



Help


SRDR Announcements



Statistics



Maintenance Schedule