Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Effects of exercise treatment with or without heat and steam generating sheet on urine loss in community-dwelling Japanese elderly women with urinary incontinence.



Key Questions Addressed
1 KQ 1: What are the benefits and harms of nonpharmacological treatments of UI in women, and how do they compare with each other? KQ 2: What are the benefits and harms of pharmacological treatments of UI in women, and how do they compare with each other? KQ 3: What are the comparative benefits and harms of nonpharmacological versus pharmacological treatments of UI in women? KQ 4: What are the benefits and harms of combined nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment of UI in women?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Effects of exercise treatment with or without heat and steam generating sheet on urine loss in community-dwelling Japanese elderly women with urinary incontinence.
Author Kim H., Yoshida H., Suzuki T.
Country Research Team for Promoting Independence of the Elderly, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo National Institute for Longevity Sciences, Aichi, Japan. kimhk@tmig.or.jp
Year 2011
Numbers Pubmed ID: 21545385

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: All studies
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 exercise+HSGS
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
2 HSGS only
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
3 education group
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
4 exercise
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country/countries Japan
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Funding source Explicitly not industry funded
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Inclusion criteria (i) suffering from urge,stress or mixed UI; (ii) being 70 years or older; and (iii)having urine loss episodes more than once a month.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Exclusion criteria (i) an unclear UI type;(ii) having urine loss episodes less than once a month;(iii) impaired mental health (a Mini-Mental StateExamination score of<24);11,12and (iv) unstable cardiacconditions such as ventricular dysrhythmias, pulmo-nary edema or other musculoskeletal conditions.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
UI type 40.13
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
34.01
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
25.85
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age 76.0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
mean
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
4.09
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Men included 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Special populations
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
147
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
100
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Race 147
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
100
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Notes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Did participants fail previous treatment? Not reported/unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study years 2006-2006
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Trial name (if given)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper cite a previous paper from the same study?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
Question exercise+HSGS HSGS only education group exercise Total Comments
AnswerFollow-up AnswerFollow-up AnswerFollow-up AnswerFollow-up AnswerFollow-up
Participant flow 37 37 36 37 147
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
37 37 36 37 147
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
0 0 0 0 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Notes No data entered.



Results & Comparisons


Results Data
Outcome: Cure etc.      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure exercise+HSGS HSGS only education group exercise


3 months

N Analyzed 37 37 34 35
Counts 19 8 1 12
Outcome: Cure etc.      Population: stress
Time Point Measure exercise+HSGS HSGS only education group exercise


3 months

N Analyzed 13 12 11 13
Counts 8 3 1 7
Percentage 61.5 25 9.1 53.8
Outcome: Cure etc.      Population: urge
Time Point Measure exercise+HSGS HSGS only education group exercise


3 months

N Analyzed 14 15 nd 12
Counts 7 2 0 2
Percentage 50 13.3 0 16.7
Outcome: Cure etc.      Population: mixed
Time Point Measure exercise+HSGS HSGS only education group exercise


3 months

N Analyzed 10 10 nd 10
Counts 4 3 0 3
Percentage 40 30 0 30


Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
RCT:.....Adequate generation of a randomized sequence Low RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
RCT:.....Allocation concealment Low RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
RCT:.....Blinding of PATIENTS High RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
RCT.....Intention-to-treat-analysis Low RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
ALL.....Blinding of OUTCOME ASSESSORS (or "DOUBLE BLIND") High RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
ALL.....Incomplete results data (attrition bias) Low RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
ALL....Group similarity at baseline (selection bias) Low RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
ALL.....Compliance with interventions Low RoB
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
NRCS.....Patients in different intervention groups selected in an equivalent manner
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
NRCS....Baseline differences between groups accounted for (Adjusted analysis)?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
ALL.....Other issues No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
ALL....Were interventions adequately described? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.