Study Title and Description
Randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback for urinary incontinence.
Key Questions Addressed
|1||KQ 1: What are the benefits and harms of nonpharmacological treatments of UI in women, and how do they compare with each other? KQ 2: What are the benefits and harms of pharmacological treatments of UI in women, and how do they compare with each other? KQ 3: What are the comparative benefits and harms of nonpharmacological versus pharmacological treatments of UI in women? KQ 4: What are the benefits and harms of combined nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment of UI in women?|
Primary Publication Information
|Title||Randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback for urinary incontinence.|
|Author||Hirakawa T., Suzuki S., Kato K., Gotoh M., Yoshikawa Y.|
|Country||Program in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-20, Daiko-minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya, 461-8673, Japan.|
Pubmed ID: 23306768
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: All studies
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.
|Question... Follow Up||Answer||Follow-up Answer|
|Trial name (if given)||nd|
|Does this paper cite a previous paper from the same study?|
|Participant flow||No data entered.|
|Notes||No data entered.|
Results & Comparisons
No Results found.
|RCT:.....Adequate generation of a randomized sequence|
|RCT:.....Blinding of PATIENTS|
|ALL.....Blinding of OUTCOME ASSESSORS (or "DOUBLE BLIND")|
|ALL.....Incomplete results data (attrition bias)|
|ALL....Group similarity at baseline (selection bias)|
|ALL.....Compliance with interventions|
|NRCS.....Patients in different intervention groups selected in an equivalent manner|
|NRCS....Baseline differences between groups accounted for (Adjusted analysis)?|
|ALL....Were interventions adequately described?|
No quality rating data was found.