This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Key Question
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Author Lizneva D., Kirubakaran R., Mykhalchenko K., Suturina L., Chernukha G., Diamond MP., Azziz R.
Country Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia; Medical Company IDK, Samara, Russian Federation; Department of Reproductive Health Protection, Scientific Center of Family Health and Human Reproduction, Irkutsk, Russian Federation.
Year 2016
Numbers Pubmed ID: 27530062

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Extraction Form
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
What is the PRIMARY FOCUS of the systematic review? Epidemiology - Incidence/prevalence
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DISCIPLINE within which the systematic review topic falls? Medicine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the primary HEALTH AREA addressed in the systematic review? Diseases of the genitourinary system
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the country of origin of the systematic review reported? ... Yes, the country was... ... United States
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this review conducted as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is the systematic review registered on PROSPERO? No, the systematic review is not registered on PROSPERO.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Were sources of FUNDING for the systematic review reported in the journal publication? Yes, reported explicitly that there was no funding for the review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many Key Questions were included in this review? 2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many studies were included in this review? 43
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was/were the funding source(s)?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
If this was not a full systematic review, what was it?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of the project on the SRDR Published Projects page? Phenotypes and body mass in women with PCOS identified in Referral vs. Unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project last updated in SRDR? 2018
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this a Cochrane review? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the format of addition of data to SRDR? Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project published to SRDR? 2015
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project published to SRDR? December
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project created in SRDR? January
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project created in SRDR? 2015
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the duration in months from project creation to publication in SRDR? 11
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the name of the EPC or Cochrane Review Group conducting the project?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DOI of the project? 10.7301/Z06D5QXR
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.