• Home
  • Published Projects
  • Registries
Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Key Question
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Post/View

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Author Lizneva D., Kirubakaran R., Mykhalchenko K., Suturina L., Chernukha G., Diamond MP., Azziz R.
Country Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia; Medical Company IDK, Samara, Russian Federation; Department of Reproductive Health Protection, Scientific Center of Family Health and Human Reproduction, Irkutsk, Russian Federation.
Year 2016
Numbers Pubmed ID: 27530062

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Extraction Form
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
What is the PRIMARY FOCUS of the systematic review? Epidemiology - Incidence/prevalence
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DISCIPLINE within which the systematic review topic falls? Medicine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the primary HEALTH AREA addressed in the systematic review? Diseases of the genitourinary system
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the country of origin of the systematic review reported? ... Yes, the country was... ... United States
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this review conducted as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is the systematic review registered on PROSPERO? No, the systematic review is not registered on PROSPERO.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Were sources of FUNDING for the systematic review reported in the journal publication? Yes, reported explicitly that there was no funding for the review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many Key Questions were included in this review? 2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many studies were included in this review? 43
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was/were the funding source(s)?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
If this was not a full systematic review, what was it?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of the project on the SRDR Published Projects page? Phenotypes and body mass in women with PCOS identified in Referral vs. Unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project last updated in SRDR? 2018
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this a Cochrane review? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the format of addition of data to SRDR? Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project published to SRDR? 2015
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project published to SRDR? December
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project created in SRDR? January
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project created in SRDR? 2015
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the duration in months from project creation to publication in SRDR? 11
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the name of the EPC or Cochrane Review Group conducting the project?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DOI of the project? 10.7301/Z06D5QXR
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.