This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

  • Home
  • Published Projects
  • Registries
Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes From Systematic Reviews



Key Questions Addressed
1 Key Question
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Post/View

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes From Systematic Reviews
Author Totten AM, Womack DM, Eden KB, McDonagh MS, Griffin JC, Grusing S, Hersh WR
Country Pacific Northwest Evidence Based Practice Center
Year 2016
Numbers Pubmed ID: 27536752

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Extraction Form
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
What is the PRIMARY FOCUS of the systematic review? Therapeutics Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes From Systematic Reviews
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DISCIPLINE within which the systematic review topic falls? Medicine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the primary HEALTH AREA addressed in the systematic review? Factors influencing health status and contact with health services general clinical outcomes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the country of origin of the systematic review reported? ... Yes, the country was... ... United States
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this review conducted as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is the systematic review registered on PROSPERO? No, the systematic review is not registered on PROSPERO.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What were the reported sources of FUNDING for the systematic review? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Were sources of FUNDING for the systematic review reported in the journal publication? Yes, reported funding source for the review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many Key Questions were included in this review? 3
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many studies were included in this review? 58 systematic reviews
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was/were the funding source(s)? AHRQ
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
If this was not a full systematic review, what was it? Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of the project on the SRDR Published Projects page? Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes from Systematic Reviews [Entered Retrospectively]
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project last updated in SRDR? 2016
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this a Cochrane review? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the format of addition of data to SRDR? Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project published to SRDR? 2016
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project published to SRDR? July
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project created in SRDR? July
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project created in SRDR? 2016
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the duration in months from project creation to publication in SRDR? 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the name of the EPC or Cochrane Review Group conducting the project? Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DOI of the project? 10.7301/Z0V40S4H
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.