• Home
  • Published Projects
  • Registries
Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review Update



Key Questions Addressed
1 Key Question
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Post/View

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review Update
Author Balk E, Adam GP, Kimmel HJ, Rofeberg V, Saeed I, Jeppson P, Trikalinos TA
Country Brown Evidence Based Practice Center
Year 2018
Numbers

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Extraction Form
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
What is the PRIMARY FOCUS of the systematic review? Therapeutics
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DISCIPLINE within which the systematic review topic falls? Medicine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the primary HEALTH AREA addressed in the systematic review? Diseases of the genitourinary system
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the country of origin of the systematic review reported? ... Yes, the country was... ... United States
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this review conducted as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is the systematic review registered on PROSPERO? ... Yes, and the PROSPERO ID is .... ... CRD42017069903
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What were the reported sources of FUNDING for the systematic review? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Were sources of FUNDING for the systematic review reported in the journal publication? Yes, reported funding source for the review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many Key Questions were included in this review? 1
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many studies were included in this review? 106
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was/were the funding source(s)? AHRQ
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
If this was not a full systematic review, what was it?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of the project on the SRDR Published Projects page? Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: A Systematic Review Update
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project last updated in SRDR? 2018
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this a Cochrane review? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the format of addition of data to SRDR? Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project published to SRDR? 2018
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project published to SRDR? June
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project created in SRDR? July
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project created in SRDR? 2017
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the duration in months from project creation to publication in SRDR? 12
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the name of the EPC or Cochrane Review Group conducting the project? Brown University Evidence-based Practice Center
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DOI of the project? 10.26300/2ed7-vz39
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.