This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

  • Home
  • Published Projects
  • Registries
Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Key Question
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Post/View

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.
Author Al-Haddad C., Abdulaal M., Al-Moujahed A., Ervin AM.
Country Ophthalmology Department, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Hamrah Street, PO Box 110236, Beirut, Lebanon.
Year 2015
Numbers Pubmed ID: 26599668

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Extraction Form
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
What is the PRIMARY FOCUS of the systematic review? Therapeutics
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DISCIPLINE within which the systematic review topic falls? Medicine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the primary HEALTH AREA addressed in the systematic review? Diseases of the eye and adnexa
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the country of origin of the systematic review reported? ... Yes, the country was... ... Lebanon
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this review conducted as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is the systematic review registered on PROSPERO? No, the systematic review is not registered on PROSPERO.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What were the reported sources of FUNDING for the systematic review? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Were sources of FUNDING for the systematic review reported in the journal publication? Yes, reported funding source for the review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many Key Questions were included in this review? 1
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many studies were included in this review? 6
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was/were the funding source(s)? NEI
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
If this was not a full systematic review, what was it?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of the project on the SRDR Published Projects page? Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2015)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project last updated in SRDR? 2019
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this a Cochrane review? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the format of addition of data to SRDR? Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project published to SRDR? 2019
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project published to SRDR? February
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project created in SRDR? September
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project created in SRDR? 2016
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the duration in months from project creation to publication in SRDR? 29
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the name of the EPC or Cochrane Review Group conducting the project? Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DOI of the project? 10.26300/0qeq-5s39
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.