Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Cluster-randomized controlled trials evaluating complex interventions in general practices are mostly ineffective: a systematic review.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Key Question
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Cluster-randomized controlled trials evaluating complex interventions in general practices are mostly ineffective: a systematic review.
Author Siebenhofer A., Paulitsch MA., Pregartner G., Berghold A., Jeitler K., Muth C., Engler J.
Country Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main 60590, Germany; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2/9/IV, Graz 8036, Austria. Electronic address: andrea.siebenhofer@medunigraz.at.
Year 2018
Numbers Pubmed ID: 29111470

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Extraction Form
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
What is the PRIMARY FOCUS of the systematic review? Therapeutics
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DISCIPLINE within which the systematic review topic falls? Medicine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the primary HEALTH AREA addressed in the systematic review? Factors influencing health status and contact with health services
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the country of origin of the systematic review reported? ... Yes, the country was... ... Germany
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this review conducted as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is the systematic review registered on PROSPERO? No, the systematic review is not registered on PROSPERO.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What were the reported sources of FUNDING for the systematic review? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Were sources of FUNDING for the systematic review reported in the journal publication? Yes, reported funding source for the review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many Key Questions were included in this review? 1
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many studies were included in this review? 29
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was/were the funding source(s)? German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
If this was not a full systematic review, what was it?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of the project on the SRDR Published Projects page? The shortcomings of cluster-randomized controlled trials for the assessment of complex interventions in general practices: a systematic review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project last updated in SRDR? 2019
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this a Cochrane review? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the format of addition of data to SRDR? Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Manual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project published to SRDR? 2019
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project published to SRDR? March
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project created in SRDR? January
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project created in SRDR? 2016
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the duration in months from project creation to publication in SRDR? 39
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the name of the EPC or Cochrane Review Group conducting the project?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DOI of the project? 10.26300/hwwm-pk67
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.