Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force



Key Questions Addressed
1 Key Question
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Author Heidi D. Nelson, MD, MPH, MACP, FRCP; Miranda Pappas, MA; Amy Cantor, MD, MPH; Elizabeth Haney, MD; Rebecca Holmes, MD
Country Pacific Northwest Evidence Based Practice Center
Year 2019
Numbers

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Extraction Form
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
What is the PRIMARY FOCUS of the systematic review? Screening Screening
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DISCIPLINE within which the systematic review topic falls? Medicine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the primary HEALTH AREA addressed in the systematic review? Neoplasms
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the country of origin of the systematic review reported? ... Yes, the country was... ... United States
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this review conducted as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Program? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is the systematic review registered on PROSPERO? No, the systematic review is not registered on PROSPERO.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What were the reported sources of FUNDING for the systematic review? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Were sources of FUNDING for the systematic review reported in the journal publication? Yes, reported funding source for the review
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many Key Questions were included in this review? 5
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
How many studies were included in this review? 110
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was/were the funding source(s)? AHRQ, US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
If this was not a full systematic review, what was it?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of the project on the SRDR Published Projects page? Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Entered Retrospectively]
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project last updated in SRDR? 2019
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is this a Cochrane review? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the format of addition of data to SRDR? Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upload
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project published to SRDR? 2019
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project published to SRDR? September
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What month was the project created in SRDR? August
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What year was the project created in SRDR? 2019
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the duration in months from project creation to publication in SRDR? 1
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the name of the EPC or Cochrane Review Group conducting the project? Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the DOI of the project? 10.26300/0f6g-jg52
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.