Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Effects of hunger state on flavour pleasantness conditioning at home: flavour-nutrient learning vs. flavour-flavour learning.



Key Questions Addressed
1 What is the effect of sugars on health outcomes in intervention studies?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Effects of hunger state on flavour pleasantness conditioning at home: flavour-nutrient learning vs. flavour-flavour learning.
Author Mobini S., Chambers LC., Yeomans MR.
Country Department of Psychology, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK. S.Mobini@sussex.ac.uk
Year 2007
Numbers Pubmed ID: 16846663
2014_11474 (internal)

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Sugar Evidence Map Intervention Studies
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Study Design Randomized Controlled Trial (parallel)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Trial Name nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Funding Source Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, U.K
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Intervention (Exposure) Information Sucrose
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
uncarbonated peach-flavoured iced tea
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
9.9%, 132 kcal 330ml
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
4 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Supplement
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Randomization Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was there a washout period between interventions? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator Information aspartame+sucrose
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
330ml
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Hypercaloric
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline Health Status healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample Size 60
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Anthropometry at Baseline nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Male % 30
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country England
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age ... Value Mean ... 23.52
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Standard Deviation ... 6.42
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was a power calculation performed? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the study population? Adults
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Publication Year 2007
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.