Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Effects of sucrose on salivary flow and composition: differences between real and sham intake.



Key Questions Addressed
1 What is the effect of sugars on health outcomes in intervention studies?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Effects of sucrose on salivary flow and composition: differences between real and sham intake.
Author Harthoorn LF., Brattinga C., Van Kekem K., Neyraud E., Dransfield E.
Country TI Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands. lucien.harthoorn@bms.com
Year 2009
Numbers Pubmed ID: 19919511
2014_11084 (internal)

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Sugar Evidence Map Intervention Studies
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Study Design Randomized Controlled Trial (parallel)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Trial Name nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Funding Source DiOGenes, of the project ‘Diet, Obesity and Genes’ supported by the European Community (Contract No. FP6-FOOD-CT-2005-513946).
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Intervention (Exposure) Information Sucrose
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sucrose
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
solution
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
solution
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
50 mM in 200 mL
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
500 mM in 200mL 672 kJ
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
1d
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
1d
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Supplement
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Supplement
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Randomization Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was there a washout period between interventions? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator Information water
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
200 ml
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Hypercaloric
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline Health Status healthy lean
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample Size 8
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Anthropometry at Baseline kg/m2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
20-25
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Male % 50
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country Netherlands
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age ... Value Range ... 23-55
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was a power calculation performed? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the study population? Adults
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Publication Year 2009
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.