Study Preview
Study Title and Description
Underlying Colorectal Cancer Was Rarely Detected After an Episode of Acute Diverticulitis: a Retrospective Analysis of 225 Patients.
Key Questions Addressed
3 | KQ 3: What are the benefits and harms of colonoscopy (or other colon imaging test) following an episode of acute diverticulitis? KQ 3a. What is the incidence of malignant and premalignant colon tumors found by colonoscopy, and what is the incidence of colon cancer mortality among patients undergoing screening? KQ 3b. What are the procedure-related and other harms of colonoscopy or CT colonography? KQ 3c. What is the frequency of inadequate imaging due to intolerance or technical feasibility? • Do the benefits and harms vary by patient characteristics, course of illness, or other factors? |
Primary Publication Information
Title | Underlying Colorectal Cancer Was Rarely Detected After an Episode of Acute Diverticulitis: a Retrospective Analysis of 225 Patients. |
Author | Khoury T., Mahamid M., Lubany A., Safadi M., Farah A., Sbeit W., Mari A. |
Country | Gastroenterology and endoscopy united, The Nazareth Hospital, EMMS, Nazareth, Israel. tawfikkhoury1@hotmail.com. |
Year | 2019 |
Numbers |
Pubmed ID: 30632029 |
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: KQ 3: Colonoscopy
Arms
Number | Title | Description | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Colonoscopy |
Question... Follow Up | Answer | Follow-up Answer | |
---|---|---|---|
Study design | Single group, no subgroup analysis | ||
Single group, no subgroup analysis | |||
if not an RCT, what was the directionality? | Retrospective | ||
Funder | Not reported (or unclear) | ||
Start and end years of the study | 2014 | ||
2018 | |||
Inclusion criteria | >16 years, acute diverticulitis, patients who underwent colonoscopy in the period of 6 months following the diagnosis with acute diverticulitis, or patients who performed virtual CT colonography in the case of contraindication to colonoscopy. | ||
Exclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria included patients with undetermined diagnosis of acute diverticulitis; patient who did not complete colonoscopy in the scheduled time; history of inflammatory bowel conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, collagenous colitis, microscopic colitis, and eosinophilic colitis; patients with oncological diseases; and patients with immunosuppressive therapy. | ||
Specific population? | No (anyone with Hx diverticulitis) | ||
No (anyone with Hx diverticulitis) | |||
No (anyone with Hx diverticulitis) | |||
No (anyone with Hx diverticulitis) | |||
Note/Comment about Design (or overall study) | |||
Country | Israel | ||
Comparison of colonoscopy vs. no colonoscopy? | No | ||
Comparison of diverticulitis vs health control? | No |
Baseline Characteristics
Question | Colonoscopy | Total | Comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Answer | Follow-up | Answer | Follow-up | ||
Participant race/ethnicity characteristics | Male | 62 | |||
Participant age, continuous | 55.73 | ||||
13.81 | |||||
24 | |||||
93 | |||||
Age >=50, % | No data entered. | ||||
Participants with Un/Complicated Diverticulitis | No data entered. | ||||
Note/Comment about baseline characteristics | Location of Diverticulitis (total = 225) Right: 16 (7.1%) Left: 202 (89.7) | ||||
Alarm symptoms | No data entered. |
Results & Comparisons
Results Data
Outcome: Colorectal cancer Population: All Participants | ||
---|---|---|
Time Point | Measure | Colonoscopy |
Enter a numeric value or title (required) years |
N Analyzed | 225 |
Counts | 17 | |
Percentage | 7.56 |
Quality Dimensions
Dimension | Value | Notes | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Q23: NHLBI - Were eligibility/selection criteria for the study population prespecified and clearly described? | Yes | ||
Q25: NHLBI - Were the outcome measures prespecified, clearly defined, valid, reliable, and assessed consistently across all study participants? | Yes | ||
If this study was an NRCS or a single-group study, did the study report adjusted results that were for differences between groups (in the case of NRCSs) or differences between subgroups (in the case of single group studies)? | No |
Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.