Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

An independent replication of the Adolescent-Community Reinforcement Approach with justice-involved youth.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title An independent replication of the Adolescent-Community Reinforcement Approach with justice-involved youth.
Author Henderson CE., Wevodau AL., Henderson SE., Colbourn SL., Gharagozloo L., North LW., Lotts VA.
Country Department of Psychology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
Year 2016
Numbers Pubmed ID: 26992083

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Evidence Map
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 CBT_ICM Adolescent-Community Reinforcement Approach
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
2 TAU
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Should this citation be included? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper originate from a primary study of interest? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Ages eligible (in years) 12
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
17
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total sample size (in all arms) 126
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age distribution of enrolled population (in years) 15.08
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Substance used Alcohol
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Cannabis
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Opioid
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Interventions studied? Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome? Objective measurement of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Self report of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age variation of enrolled population (in years) 1.11
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is any arm a brief intervention (or single session)? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Income level of country(ies) of origin Lower and lower middle income
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons


Results Data
Outcome: pct abstinent for nos      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT_ICM TAU


0 months

Counts 2 4
Percentage 3 6
N Analyzed 63 63


3 months

Counts 40 33
Percentage 65 55
N Analyzed 63 63


6 months

Counts 32 30
Percentage 53 52
N Analyzed 63 63


12 months

Counts 24 24
Percentage 41 44
N Analyzed 63 63
Outcome: alcohol use days      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT_ICM TAU


0 months

Mean 0.23 0.18
SD 0.18 0.16
N Analyzed 63 63


3 months

Mean 0.04 0.04
SD 0.09 0.09
N Analyzed 63 63


6 months

Mean 0.04 0.05
SD 0.09 0.09
N Analyzed 63 63


12 months

Mean 0.06 0.07
SD 0.09 0.15
N Analyzed 63 63
Outcome: SPS      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT_ICM TAU


0 months

Mean 4.51 3.48
SD 4.51 3.56
N Analyzed 63 63


3 months

Mean 0.56 0.97
SD 1.52 2.28
N Analyzed 63 63


6 months

Mean 0.9 1.64
SD 2.1 3.19
N Analyzed 63 63


12 months

Mean 1.16 1.53
SD 2.34 3.42
N Analyzed 63 63


Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Intention-to-treat-analysis: Bias due to incomplete reporting and analysis according to group allocation Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias): Selection bias due to dissimilarity at baseline for the most important prognostic indicators Yes similar
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Co-interventions (performance bias): Performance bias because co-interventions were different across groups Yes none
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Compliance (performance bias): Performance bias due to inappropriate compliance with interventions across groups No Data measured but not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Timing of outcome assessments (detection bias): Detection bias because important outcomes were not measured at the same time across groups Yes no difference
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. If yes, describe them in the Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Random sequence generation (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate generation of a randomized sequence Low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate concealment of allocations prior to assignment Low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of participants (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants during the study High not possible
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of personnel/ care providers (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by personnel/care providers during the study. High not possible
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias): Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors. Unclear nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): Attrition bias due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data Low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Selective Reporting (reporting bias): Reporting bias due to selective outcome reporting
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.