Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Abstinence based incentives plus parent training for adolescent alcohol and other substance misuse.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Abstinence based incentives plus parent training for adolescent alcohol and other substance misuse.
Author Stanger C., Scherer EA., Babbin SF., Ryan SR., Budney AJ.
Country Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Year 2017
Numbers Pubmed ID: 28414474

Secondary Publication Information
UI Title Author Country Year
Family Based Contingency Management for Adolescent Alcohol Abuse Stanger 2018
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |



Extraction Form: Evidence Map
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 CBT_MI_Fam_CM_ICM MET_CBT + abstinence incentives (Experimental)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
2 CBT_MI_CM_ICM MET_CBT + attendance incentives (Control)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Should this citation be included? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper originate from a primary study of interest? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Ages eligible (in years) 12
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
18
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total sample size (in all arms) 75
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age distribution of enrolled population (in years) 16.1
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Substance used Alcohol
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Cannabis
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Interventions studied? Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome? Objective measurement of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Self report of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age variation of enrolled population (in years) 1.2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is any arm a brief intervention (or single session)? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Income level of country(ies) of origin ... Country(ies) name(s) Unclear ... United States
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons


Results Data
Outcome: pct abstinent for alcohol      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT_MI_Fam_CM_ICM CBT_MI_CM_ICM


36 weeks

Percentage 32.1 36.7
N Analyzed 37 38
Outcome: pct abstinent for cannabis      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT_MI_Fam_CM_ICM CBT_MI_CM_ICM


36 weeks

Percentage 29 50
N Analyzed 37 38
95% CI low 95% CI high P-Value OR Ratio_of_Means RoM_CI low RoM_CI high RoM_P-value
Outcome: alcohol use days      Population: All Participants Between-Arm Comparisons
Time Point Measure CBT_MI_Fam_CM_ICM CBT_MI_CM_ICM Comparison Measure CBT_MI_Fam_CM_ICM vs. CBT_MI_CM_ICM


36 weeks

N Analyzed 37 38 0.38
Mean 8.3 12 3.85
SD 9.6 11.2 0.74
1.21
0.74
0.59
0.92
0.007
95% CI low 95% CI high P-Value OR Ratio_of_Means RoM_CI low RoM_CI high RoM_P-value
Outcome: cannabis use days      Population: All Participants Between-Arm Comparisons
Time Point Measure CBT_MI_Fam_CM_ICM CBT_MI_CM_ICM Comparison Measure CBT_MI_Fam_CM_ICM vs. CBT_MI_CM_ICM


36 weeks

N Analyzed 37 38 0.69
Mean 26.6 36.5 10.36
SD 29.9 37.6 0.15
2.67
0.63
0.53
0.41
<0.0001


Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Intention-to-treat-analysis: Bias due to incomplete reporting and analysis according to group allocation No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias): Selection bias due to dissimilarity at baseline for the most important prognostic indicators Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Co-interventions (performance bias): Performance bias because co-interventions were different across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Compliance (performance bias): Performance bias due to inappropriate compliance with interventions across groups No Data
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Timing of outcome assessments (detection bias): Detection bias because important outcomes were not measured at the same time across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. If yes, describe them in the Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Random sequence generation (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate generation of a randomized sequence Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate concealment of allocations prior to assignment Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of participants (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants during the study High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of personnel/ care providers (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by personnel/care providers during the study. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias): Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): Attrition bias due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Selective Reporting (reporting bias): Reporting bias due to selective outcome reporting
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.