Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Cognitive-behavioral coping skills and psychoeducation therapies for adolescent substance abuse.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Cognitive-behavioral coping skills and psychoeducation therapies for adolescent substance abuse.
Author Kaminer Y., Burleson JA., Goldberger R.
Country Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-2103, USA.
Year 2002
Numbers Pubmed ID: 12436013

Secondary Publication Information
UI Title Author Country Year
Self-efficacy as a predictor of treatment outcome in adolescent substance use disorders. Burleson JA., Kaminer Y. Alcohol Research Center, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA. burleson@up.uchc.edu 2005
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does temperament moderate treatment response in adolescent substance use disorders? Kaminer Y., Burleson JA. University of Connecticut Health Center, Alcohol Research Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-2103, USA. kaminer@psychiatry.uchc.edu 2008
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |



Extraction Form: Evidence Map
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 CBT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
2 Educ psychoeducational therapy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Should this citation be included? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper originate from a primary study of interest? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Ages eligible (in years) 13
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
18
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total sample size (in all arms) 88
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age distribution of enrolled population (in years) 15.4
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Substance used Alcohol
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Cannabis
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Opioid
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Stimulant
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Interventions studied? Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome? Objective measurement of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Self report of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age variation of enrolled population (in years) 1.3
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is any arm a brief intervention (or single session)? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Income level of country(ies) of origin ... Country(ies) name(s) Unclear ...
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons


Results Data
Outcome: alcohol abuse sxs      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT Educ


0 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.8 1.4
SD 0.9 1.1
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.5 0.6
SD 0.6 0.7
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.3 0.5
SD 0.3 0.4
SE
Outcome: nos sxs      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT Educ


0 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 1.8 1.6
SD 1.0 1.1
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.6 1.0
SD 0.9 1.0
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.6 0.6
SD 0.8 0.8
SE
Outcome: School      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT Educ


0 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 1.6 1.6
SD 1.4 1.2
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 1.3 1.6
SD 1.4 1.5
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.9 0.8
SD 1.0 1.1
SE
Outcome: Family      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT Educ


0 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 1.5 1.4
SD 0.9 1.1
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.8 1.0
SD 0.9 1.0
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.5 0.7
SD 0.7 1.1
SE
Outcome: Peer      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT Educ


0 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.6 0.5
SD 0.7 0.8
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.5 0.6
SD 0.6 0.6
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.5 0.5
SD 0.8 0.5
SE
Outcome: Illegal behavior      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT Educ


0 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 1.2 1.2
SD 1.1 1.1
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.7 0.6
SD 1.1 0.9
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.3 0.2
SD 0.7 0.4
SE
Outcome: Psychiatric outcome      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure CBT Educ


0 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 1.3 1.4
SD 1.0 1.2
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 1.0 1.0
SD 1.1 1.1
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 51 37
Mean 0.6 0.8
SD 0.8 0.9
SE


Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Intention-to-treat-analysis: Bias due to incomplete reporting and analysis according to group allocation Unsure Only for urinalysis data
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias): Selection bias due to dissimilarity at baseline for the most important prognostic indicators Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Co-interventions (performance bias): Performance bias because co-interventions were different across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Compliance (performance bias): Performance bias due to inappropriate compliance with interventions across groups No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Timing of outcome assessments (detection bias): Detection bias because important outcomes were not measured at the same time across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. If yes, describe them in the Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Random sequence generation (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate generation of a randomized sequence Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate concealment of allocations prior to assignment Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of participants (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants during the study High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of personnel/ care providers (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by personnel/care providers during the study. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias): Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors. Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): Attrition bias due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Selective Reporting (reporting bias): Reporting bias due to selective outcome reporting
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.