Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Family-Based HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk Reduction for Drug-Involved Young Offenders: 42-Month Outcomes.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Family-Based HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk Reduction for Drug-Involved Young Offenders: 42-Month Outcomes.
Author Rowe CL., Alberga L., Dakof GA., Henderson CE., Ungaro R., Liddle HA.
Country Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Year 2016
Numbers Pubmed ID: 26879671

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Evidence Map
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 Fam MDFT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
2 TAU Enhanced Services as Usual
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Should this citation be included? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper originate from a primary study of interest? ... Study name, e.g. INCANT ... CJ-DATS
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Ages eligible (in years) 13
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
17
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total sample size (in all arms) 154
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age distribution of enrolled population (in years) 15
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Substance used SUD (not further described, except maybe excluding nicotine)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
SUD (not further described, except maybe excluding nicotine)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Interventions studied? Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome? Physical health
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age variation of enrolled population (in years) 1.30
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is any arm a brief intervention (or single session)? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Income level of country(ies) of origin Upper income
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons


Results Data
Outcome: Sex      Population: Site A
Time Point Measure Fam TAU


0 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 9 19


3 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 6 9


6 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 3 6


9 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 0 9


18 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 0 13


24 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 9 6


36 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 6 6


42 months

N Analyzed 43 42
Percentage 3 3
Outcome: Sex      Population: Site B
Time Point Measure Fam TAU


0 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 9 5


3 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 7 8


6 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 5 8


9 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 3 3


18 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 8 0


24 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 3 8


36 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 11 8


42 months

N Analyzed 33 36
Percentage 6 12


Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Intention-to-treat-analysis: Bias due to incomplete reporting and analysis according to group allocation Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias): Selection bias due to dissimilarity at baseline for the most important prognostic indicators No Data The baseline data and comparisons presented are by site, and not by intervention for both sites combined.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Co-interventions (performance bias): Performance bias because co-interventions were different across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Compliance (performance bias): Performance bias due to inappropriate compliance with interventions across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Timing of outcome assessments (detection bias): Detection bias because important outcomes were not measured at the same time across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. If yes, describe them in the Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Random sequence generation (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate generation of a randomized sequence Low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate concealment of allocations prior to assignment Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of participants (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants during the study High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of personnel/ care providers (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by personnel/care providers during the study. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias): Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors. Low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): Attrition bias due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data Low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Selective Reporting (reporting bias): Reporting bias due to selective outcome reporting
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.