Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Consejo breve para adolescentes escolares que abusan del alcohol. = School-based brief counseling for teenage drinkers



Key Questions Addressed
1 Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Consejo breve para adolescentes escolares que abusan del alcohol. = School-based brief counseling for teenage drinkers
Author Martínez Martínez, KI; Pedroza Cabrera, FJ; Vacío Muro, MdlA; Jiménez Pérez, AL; Salazar Garza, SL
Country
Year 2008
Numbers Pubmed ID: 2009-05582-007

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Evidence Map
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 MI Follow: "Brief Advice for Adolescents Who Abuse Alcohol or Other Drugs" (Salazar, M. L., Martínez, K. I., Pedroza, F. J. & Vacio, M. A. (2008). Consejo breve para adolescentes que inician el consumo de sustancias. Manual de Terapeuta. Manuscrito no publicado. Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México). 90 minute single session
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
2 TAU waiting-list control
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Should this citation be included? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper originate from a primary study of interest? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Ages eligible (in years) 14
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
18
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total sample size (in all arms) 40
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age distribution of enrolled population (in years) 16
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Substance used Alcohol
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Alcohol
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Alcohol
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Interventions studied? Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No active treatment
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age variation of enrolled population (in years) 1.52
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is any arm a brief intervention (or single session)? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Income level of country(ies) of origin ... Country(ies) name(s) Upper middle income: name country(ies) ... Mexico
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons


Results Data
Outcome: alcohol abstain      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure MI TAU


6 months

N Analyzed 23 17
Counts 8 0
Note 0 implied (not reported)
Outcome: alcohol abstain      Population: Males
Time Point Measure MI TAU


6 months

N Analyzed 13 13
Counts 3 0
Note 0 implied (not reported)
Outcome: alcohol abstain      Population: Females
Time Point Measure MI TAU


6 months

N Analyzed 10 4
Counts 5 0
Note 0 implied (not reported)
Outcome: alcohol drinks      Population: All Participants Between-Arm Comparisons
Time Point Measure MI TAU Comparison Measure


0 months

N Analyzed 23 17
Mean 40.78 41.58
Note The denominator (3 months) is a best guess based on the description of the intake interview questions. Not explicitly defined. Text and figure differ by a factor of 10. Data taken from text.
SD 24.57 21.65


3 months

N Analyzed 23 17
Mean 12.04 48
SD 13.20 47.60


6 months

N Analyzed 23 17
Mean 14.30 40.76
SD 14.01 54.26
Outcome: alcohol use days      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure MI TAU


0 months

N Analyzed
Mean
SD
Note


3 months

N Analyzed
Mean
SD


6 months

N Analyzed
Mean
SD
Outcome: alcohol use days      Population: Males
Time Point Measure MI TAU


0 months

N Analyzed 13 13
Mean 9.5 9.2
Note The denominator (3 months) is a best guess based on the description of the intake interview questions. Not explicitly defined.
SD 7 5.2


6 months

N Analyzed 13 13
Mean 6.8 8.1
SD 5.3 7.2
Outcome: alcohol use days      Population: Females
Time Point Measure MI TAU


0 months

N Analyzed 10 4
Mean 9.7 11.8
Note The denominator (3 months) is a best guess based on the description of the intake interview questions. Not explicitly defined.
SD 3.9 2.9


6 months

N Analyzed 10 4
Mean 4 9.6
SD 2.6 11.9
Outcome: heavy drinking days      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure MI TAU


0 months

N Analyzed
Mean
SD


6 months

N Analyzed
Mean
SD
Outcome: heavy drinking days      Population: Males
Time Point Measure MI TAU


0 months

N Analyzed 13 13
Mean 3.2 3.6
Note The denominator (3 months) is a best guess based on the description of the intake interview questions. Not explicitly defined.
SD 3.8 3.6


6 months

N Analyzed 13 13
Mean 1 4.5
SD 1.5 3.8
Outcome: heavy drinking days      Population: Females
Time Point Measure MI TAU


0 months

N Analyzed 10 4
Mean 4.4 4.9
Note The denominator (3 months) is a best guess based on the description of the intake interview questions. Not explicitly defined.
SD 3 1.9


6 months

N Analyzed 10 4
Mean 0.7 4.7
SD 1.5 4.6


Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Intention-to-treat-analysis: Bias due to incomplete reporting and analysis according to group allocation No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias): Selection bias due to dissimilarity at baseline for the most important prognostic indicators No Data
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Co-interventions (performance bias): Performance bias because co-interventions were different across groups No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Compliance (performance bias): Performance bias due to inappropriate compliance with interventions across groups Yes Among analyzed (single session)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Timing of outcome assessments (detection bias): Detection bias because important outcomes were not measured at the same time across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. If yes, describe them in the Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Random sequence generation (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate generation of a randomized sequence Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate concealment of allocations prior to assignment Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of participants (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants during the study High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of personnel/ care providers (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by personnel/care providers during the study. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias): Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): Attrition bias due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data High 23% dropout (12/52)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Selective Reporting (reporting bias): Reporting bias due to selective outcome reporting
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.