Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

A pilot randomized controlled trial of a technology-based substance use intervention for youth exiting foster care



Key Questions Addressed
1 Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title A pilot randomized controlled trial of a technology-based substance use intervention for youth exiting foster care
Author Braciszewski, Jordan M.;Tzilos Wernette, Golfo K.; Moore, Roland S.; Bock, Beth C.; Stout, Robert L; Chamberlain, Patricia
Country
Year 2018
Numbers

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Evidence Map
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 MI iHeLP
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
2 TAU Control
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Should this citation be included? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Reasons for rejection No outcomes of interest
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Other ...
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper originate from a primary study of interest? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Ages eligible (in years) 18
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
19
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total sample size (in all arms) 33
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age distribution of enrolled population (in years) 18.99
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Substance used SUD (not further described, except maybe excluding nicotine)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
SUD (not further described, except maybe excluding nicotine)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Interventions studied? Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome? Objective measurement of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Self report of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Objective measurement of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Self report of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age variation of enrolled population (in years) 0.42
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nr
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is any arm a brief intervention (or single session)? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Income level of country(ies) of origin Upper income
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Upper income
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons


Results Data
Outcome: cannabis use days      Population: All Participants
Time Point Measure MI TAU


0 months

N Analyzed 14 19
Mean 34.05 26.32
SD 40 35.38
SE


1 months

N Analyzed 13 18
Mean 60.46 39.36
SD 38.43 38.51
SE


3 months

N Analyzed 12 18
Mean 53.02 37.90
SD 39.42 39.26
SE


6 months

N Analyzed 12 18
Mean 65.48 30.49
SD 36.25 41.14
SE


9 months

N Analyzed 12 17
Mean 62.80 29.91
SD 38.87 39.38
SE


12 months

N Analyzed 11 14
Mean 65.26 40.56
SD 41.10 38.25
SE


Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Intention-to-treat-analysis: Bias due to incomplete reporting and analysis according to group allocation Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias): Selection bias due to dissimilarity at baseline for the most important prognostic indicators Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Co-interventions (performance bias): Performance bias because co-interventions were different across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Compliance (performance bias): Performance bias due to inappropriate compliance with interventions across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Timing of outcome assessments (detection bias): Detection bias because important outcomes were not measured at the same time across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. If yes, describe them in the Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Random sequence generation (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate generation of a randomized sequence High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate concealment of allocations prior to assignment
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of participants (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants during the study High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of personnel/ care providers (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by personnel/care providers during the study. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias): Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): Attrition bias due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Selective Reporting (reporting bias): Reporting bias due to selective outcome reporting
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.