Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Impact of Brief Intervention Services on Drug Using Truant Youth Arrest Charges over Time.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Evidence map
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Impact of Brief Intervention Services on Drug Using Truant Youth Arrest Charges over Time.
Author Dembo R., Briones-Robinson R., Wareham J., Schmeidler J., Winters KC., Barrett K., Ungaro R., Karas LM., Belenko S.
Country Criminology Department University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue Tampa, FL 33620 rdembo@usf.edu.
Year 2014
Numbers Pubmed ID: 25382960

Secondary Publication Information
UI Title Author Country Year
Brief Intervention for Truant Youth Sexual Risk Behavior and Alcohol Use: A Parallel Process Growth Model Analysis. Dembo R., Briones-Robinson R., Ungaro R., Barrett K., Gulledge L., Winters KC., Belenko S., Karas LM., Wareham J. University of South Florida. 2014
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Brief Intervention Impact on Truant Youth Attitudes to School and School Behavior Problems: A Longitudinal Study. Dembo R., Briones-Robinson R., Wareham J., Winters KC., Ungaro R., Schmeidler J. Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. 2014
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Brief Intervention Impact on Truant Youths' Marijuana Use: 18-Month Follow-Up. Dembo R., Briones Robinson R., Schmeidler J., Wareham J., Ungaro R., Winters KC., Karas L., Wothke W., Belenko S. University of South Florida, Department of Criminology, Tampa, FL 33620, , , rdembo@usf.edu. 2014
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |



Extraction Form: Evidence Map
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Should this citation be included? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does this paper originate from a primary study of interest? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Ages eligible (in years) 11
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
17
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total sample size (in all arms) 180
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age distribution of enrolled population (in years) 14.79
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Substance used SUD (not further described, except maybe excluding nicotine)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Interventions studied? Behavioral
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome? Self report of use/abstinence and/or intensity
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Legal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Age variation of enrolled population (in years) 1.3
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study type RCT
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is any arm a brief intervention (or single session)? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Income level of country(ies) of origin ... Country(ies) name(s) Unclear ... United States
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.

Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Intention-to-treat-analysis: Bias due to incomplete reporting and analysis according to group allocation No Data
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias): Selection bias due to dissimilarity at baseline for the most important prognostic indicators Unsure
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Co-interventions (performance bias): Performance bias because co-interventions were different across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Compliance (performance bias): Performance bias due to inappropriate compliance with interventions across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Timing of outcome assessments (detection bias): Detection bias because important outcomes were not measured at the same time across groups Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. If yes, describe them in the Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Random sequence generation (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate generation of a randomized sequence Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias): Selection bias (biased allocation to interventions) due to inadequate concealment of allocations prior to assignment Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of participants (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants during the study High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of personnel/ care providers (performance bias): Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by personnel/care providers during the study. High
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias): Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors. Unclear
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): Attrition bias due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data Low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Selective Reporting (reporting bias): Reporting bias due to selective outcome reporting
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.