Study Title and Description
Nonpainful remote electrical stimulation alleviates episodic migraine pain.
Key Questions Addressed
|3||KQ3a. What is the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacologic therapy versus sham treatment, waitlist, usual care, attention control, and no treatment after followup at the following intervals: < 1 day; 1 day to <1 week; 1 week to <2 weeks; 2 weeks to 4 weeks? KQ3b. What is the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacologic treatments (e.g. exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture, biofeedback, noninvasive neuromodulation devices) for outcomes related to pain, function, pain relief satisfaction, and quality of life? KQ3c. How does effectiveness of nonpharmacologic therapy vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g. age, gender); (2) patient medical comorbidities? KQ3d. How do harms vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g. age, gender); (2) patient medical comorbidities; (3) the type of treatment used; (4) the frequency of therapy; (5) the duration of therapy?|
Primary Publication Information
|Title||Nonpainful remote electrical stimulation alleviates episodic migraine pain.|
|Author||Yarnitsky D., Volokh L., Ironi A., Weller B., Shor M., Shifrin A., Granovsky Y.|
|Country||From Rambam Healthcare Campus and Technion Faculty of Medicine (D.Y., M.S., A.S., Y.G.), Haifa; Theranica Ltd. (L.V., A.I.), Netanya; and Bnei Zion Medical Center (B.W.), Haifa, Israel. firstname.lastname@example.org.|
Pubmed ID: 28251920
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: Key Question 3
|Question... Follow Up||Answer||Follow-up Answer|
Results & Comparisons
No Results found.