Study Title and Description
Endotracheal intubation and esophageal tracheal Combitube insertion by regular ambulance attendants: a comparative trial.
Key Questions Addressed
|3||Key Question 3 a. What are the comparative benefits and harms of supraglottic airway versus endotracheal intubation for patients requiring prehospital ventilatory support or airway protection? b. Are the comparative benefits and harms modified by: i. Techniques or devices used? ii. Characteristics of emergency medical services personnel (including training, proficiency, experience, certification, licensure level, and/or scope of practice level)? iii. Patient characteristics?|
Primary Publication Information
|Title||Endotracheal intubation and esophageal tracheal Combitube insertion by regular ambulance attendants: a comparative trial.|
|Author||Rumball C., Macdonald D., Barber P., Wong H., Smecher C.|
|Country||Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.|
|Year||-- Not Found --|
Pubmed ID: 14691782
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: Key Questions 1-4
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.
|Question... Follow Up||Answer||Follow-up Answer|
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.
Results & Comparisons
No Results found.
|Arm or Total||Title||Description||Comments|
No quality dimensions were specified.
No quality rating data was found.