This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Endotracheal intubation and esophageal tracheal Combitube insertion by regular ambulance attendants: a comparative trial.



Key Questions Addressed
3 Key Question 3 a. What are the comparative benefits and harms of supraglottic airway versus endotracheal intubation for patients requiring prehospital ventilatory support or airway protection? b. Are the comparative benefits and harms modified by: i. Techniques or devices used? ii. Characteristics of emergency medical services personnel (including training, proficiency, experience, certification, licensure level, and/or scope of practice level)? iii. Patient characteristics?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Endotracheal intubation and esophageal tracheal Combitube insertion by regular ambulance attendants: a comparative trial.
Author Rumball C., Macdonald D., Barber P., Wong H., Smecher C.
Country Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Year -- Not Found --
Numbers Pubmed ID: 14691782

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Key Questions 1-4
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.