Study Title and Description
Preliminary Report: Comparing Aspiration Rates between Prehospital Patients Managed with Extraglottic Airway Devices and Endotracheal Intubation.
Key Questions Addressed
|3||Key Question 3 a. What are the comparative benefits and harms of supraglottic airway versus endotracheal intubation for patients requiring prehospital ventilatory support or airway protection? b. Are the comparative benefits and harms modified by: i. Techniques or devices used? ii. Characteristics of emergency medical services personnel (including training, proficiency, experience, certification, licensure level, and/or scope of practice level)? iii. Patient characteristics?|
Primary Publication Information
|Title||Preliminary Report: Comparing Aspiration Rates between Prehospital Patients Managed with Extraglottic Airway Devices and Endotracheal Intubation.|
|Author||Steuerwald MT., Braude DA., Petersen TR., Peterson K., Torres MA.|
|Country||UW Med Flight, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 310, Mail Code 9123, Madison, WI 53705. Electronic address: email@example.com.|
|Year||-- Not Found --|
Pubmed ID: 29935702
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: Key Questions 1-4
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.
|Question... Follow Up||Answer||Follow-up Answer|
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.
Results & Comparisons
No Results found.
|Arm or Total||Title||Description||Comments|
No quality dimensions were specified.
No quality rating data was found.