This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

A comparison of rapid-sequence intubation and etomidate-only intubation in the prehospital air medical setting.



Key Questions Addressed
4 What are the comparative benefits and harms of the following variations of any one of the three included airway interventions (bag valve mask, supraglottic airways, or endotracheal intubation) for patients requiring prehospital ventilatory support or airway protection: i. Techniques or devices used? ii. Characteristics of emergency medical services personnel (including training, proficiency, experience, certification, licensure level, and/or scope of practice level)? iii. Patient characteristics?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title A comparison of rapid-sequence intubation and etomidate-only intubation in the prehospital air medical setting.
Author Bozeman WP., Kleiner DM., Huggett V.
Country Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. wBozeman@wfubmc.edu
Year 2006
Numbers Pubmed ID: 16418085

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Key Questions 1-4
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.