This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Fish intake and the risk of incident heart failure: the Women's Health Initiative.



Key Questions Addressed
2 Observational studies (longitudinal; quantile or continuous analysis)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Fish intake and the risk of incident heart failure: the Women's Health Initiative.
Author Belin RJ., Greenland P., Martin L., Oberman A., Tinker L., Robinson J., Larson J., Van Horn L., Lloyd-Jones D.
Country Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Year 2011
Numbers Pubmed ID: 21610249

Secondary Publication Information
UI Title Author Country Year
Dietary fish intake and incident atrial fibrillation (from the Women's Health Initiative). Berry JD., Prineas RJ., van Horn L., Passman R., Larson J., Goldberger J., Snetselaar L., Tinker L., Liu K., Lloyd-Jones DM. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA. jarett.berry@utsouthwestern.edu 2010
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |



Extraction Form: Observational Studies
Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Study Design Observational: Prospective, longitudinal study of intake (eg, FFQ, biomarker)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the name of this study? (e.g. DART, Physician's Health Study) Women's Health Initiative
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country in which study conducted (where subjects live) US
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Funding source Industry funded
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Eligibility Criteria: Women, 50-79 y, Healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Population Primary Prevention, Healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Conflict of interest No Data regarding conflict of interest
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Does the study report a subgroup or predictor (regression) analysis for an outcome of interest? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What type(s) of analysis is/are reported? Baseline intake (eg, from FFQ) vs. outcomes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Quantiles of baseline measures
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study start date(s) nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Male, percent 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Race ~84%
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
See Table 1. There are estimates- the actual percentages could be calculated.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
~7%
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
~3%
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
~5%
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
American India/Alaskan Native: ~0.4% Unknown ~1%
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline characteristics, continuous skip
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
50-79
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
127
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
skip
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
18
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
skip
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
64
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
17
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
28
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
6
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
nd
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline Diseases/Conditions 4
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
5
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
used data Q2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
n3 Source Fish diet
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Diet (Total)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.

Quality Dimensions
Dimension Value Notes Comments
Selection bias (NOT NESTED CASE CONTROL): Is there clear demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at the start of the study (baseline)? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparability/Adjustment (ALL OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES): Were the analyses adjusted for confounders (or other factors)? Yes Including diet and CVD risk factors
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome assessment (ALL STUDIES): Were OUTCOME ASSESSORS adequately BLINDED? low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) due to amount, nature or handling of incomplete outcome data (ALL STUDIES) low
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Nutrition, FFQ Baseline intake: Was the dietary assessment instrument (eg, FFQ) described to have measured n-3 FA (ALL STUDIES WITH FFQ)? Yes Measured n-3 FA from ONLY diet
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Nutrition, Baseline data: Were the ranges or distributions of the nutrient exposures adequately reported (ie, quantile means/medians SD and/or ranges) (ALL OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES)? No only reports quantile range, not median
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Additional Bias: Bias due to problems not covered elsewhere in the table. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Do any specific outcomes have a high risk of bias (different than others)? If so, describe in Notes. No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.