Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Digestion and physiological properties of resistant starch in the human large bowel.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Is this a fiber intervention study?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Digestion and physiological properties of resistant starch in the human large bowel.
Author Cummings JH., Beatty ER., Kingman SM., Bingham SA., Englyst HN.
Country Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge.
Year 1996
Numbers Pubmed ID: 8695600

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Fiber Database
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Year of Publication 1996
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country of Publication United Kingdom
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the study design? Randomized Controlled Trial (Crossover)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? unspecified
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study diet type Isocaloric/Maintenance
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Level of feeding control for dietary intervention All food provided
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample size 12
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a run-in period? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a washout period? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Did the administered fiber dose change over the course of the study? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the age of the population (categorical)? Adults (20+ Years)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, mean age in years 31
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, age range in years 22-43
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Population, mean BMI, kg/m2 22.5
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, BMI Range, kg/m2 18.6-28.4
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline health status Healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Gender (% male) ~58
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-type Resistant Starch Type 2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 1 (g) 26.5
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-Duration of intervention 15 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-how was the fiber administered? Single Food
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-type Resistant Starch Type 2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 1 (g) 29.7
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-Duration of intervention 15 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-how was the fiber administered? Single Food
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-type Resistant Starch Type 3
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 1 (g) 17.4
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-Duration of intervention 15 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-how was the fiber administered? Single Food
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-type Resistant Starch Type 3
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 1 (g) 19.0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-Duration of intervention 15 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-how was the fiber administered? Single Food
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1- what was the comparator used in the intervention? starch free, no biscuits given
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-dose 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-duration of comparator intervention 15 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-how was the comparator administered to participants? Diet
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2- what was the comparator used in the intervention? wheat starch that is fully digested in the small intestine
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-dose 0.4
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-duration of comparator intervention 15 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-how was the comparator administered to participants? Single Food
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3- what was the comparator used in the intervention? bran (18.4 g NSP)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-dose 0.4
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-duration of comparator intervention 15 days
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-how was the comparator administered to participants? Single Food
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.