Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Colonic bacterial activity and serum lipid risk factors for cardiovascular disease.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Is this a fiber intervention study?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Colonic bacterial activity and serum lipid risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Author Jenkins DJ., Vuksan V., Rao AV., Vidgen E., Kendall CW., Tariq N., W├╝rsch P., Koellreutter B., Shiwnarain N., Jeffcoat R.
Country Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Center, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Year 1999
Numbers Pubmed ID: 10024093

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Fiber Database
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Year of Publication 1999
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country of Publication Canada
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the study design? Randomized Controlled Trial (Crossover)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? double blind
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study diet type Isocaloric/Maintenance
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Level of feeding control for dietary intervention Food partially provided
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample size 24
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a run-in period? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a washout period? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Did the administered fiber dose change over the course of the study? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the age of the population (categorical)? Adults (20+ Years)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, mean age in years 33
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, age range in years 22-53
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Population, mean BMI, kg/m2 23.7
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, BMI Range, kg/m2 19.4-34.2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline health status Healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Gender (% male) ~50%
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-type High-Amylose Maize Starch
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 1 (g) 21.5
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-Duration of intervention 2 weeks
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-how was the fiber administered? Combination Of Foods
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-type Resistant Starch Type 3
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 1 (g) 27.9
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-Duration of intervention 2 weeks
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-how was the fiber administered? Combination Of Foods
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-type -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 1 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-Duration of intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-how was the fiber administered? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-type -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 1 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-Duration of intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-how was the fiber administered? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1- what was the comparator used in the intervention? matched low-fiber wheat starch (wheat flour) control
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-dose 2.3 g RS
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-duration of comparator intervention 2 weeks
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-how was the comparator administered to participants? Combination Of Foods
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2- what was the comparator used in the intervention? matched high-fiber wheat starch (wheat bran) control
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-dose 1.5 g RS
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-duration of comparator intervention 2 weeks
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-how was the comparator administered to participants? Combination Of Foods
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.