Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Effect of the glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates of cereal-based breakfast meals on glucose tolerance at lunch in healthy subjects.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Is this a fiber intervention study?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Effect of the glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates of cereal-based breakfast meals on glucose tolerance at lunch in healthy subjects.
Author Liljeberg HG., Akerberg AK., Björck IM.
Country Department of Applied Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Chemical Center, Lund University, Sweden. Helena.Liljeberg@inl.lth.se
Year 1999
Numbers Pubmed ID: 10197565

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Fiber Database
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Year of Publication 1999
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country of Publication Sweden
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the study design? Randomized Controlled Trial (Crossover)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? unspecified
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study diet type acute feeding study
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Level of feeding control for dietary intervention All food provided
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample size 10
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a run-in period? Unspecified
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a washout period? Unspecified
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Did the administered fiber dose change over the course of the study? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the age of the population (categorical)? Adults (20+ Years)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, mean age in years NR
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, age range in years 22-57
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Population, mean BMI, kg/m2 21.6
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, BMI Range, kg/m2 -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline health status Healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Gender (% male) 40
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-type Barley Fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 1 (g) 11.4 (RS + DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-Duration of intervention ~7 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-type Barley Fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 1 (g) 18.8 (RS + DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-Duration of intervention ~7 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-type Barley Fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 1 (g) 36.2 (RS + DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-Duration of intervention ~7 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-type Potato Fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 1 (g) 11.7 (RS + DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-Duration of intervention ~7 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1- what was the comparator used in the intervention? white wheat bread
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-dose 2.1 (RS + DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-duration of comparator intervention ~7 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-how was the comparator administered to participants? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2- what was the comparator used in the intervention? white wheat bread served with vinaigrette sauce, water, and olive oil
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-dose 2.1 (RS + DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-duration of comparator intervention ~7 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-how was the comparator administered to participants? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3- what was the comparator used in the intervention? spaghetti made from 100% durum wheat flour
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-dose 2.1 (RS + DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-duration of comparator intervention ~7 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-how was the comparator administered to participants? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.