Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Combining wheat bran with resistant starch has more beneficial effects on fecal indexes than does wheat bran alone.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Is this a fiber intervention study?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Combining wheat bran with resistant starch has more beneficial effects on fecal indexes than does wheat bran alone.
Author Muir JG., Yeow EG., Keogh J., Pizzey C., Bird AR., Sharpe K., O'Dea K., Macrae FA.
Country Department of Gastroenterology, Monash University, Box Hill Hospital, Victoria, Australia. jane.muir@med.monash.edu.au
Year 2004
Numbers Pubmed ID: 15159232

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Fiber Database
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Year of Publication 2004
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country of Publication Australia
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the study design? Randomized Controlled Trial (Crossover)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? unspecified
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study diet type Isocaloric/Maintenance
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Level of feeding control for dietary intervention All food provided
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample size 20
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a run-in period? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a washout period? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Did the administered fiber dose change over the course of the study? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the age of the population (categorical)? Adults (20+ Years)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, mean age in years 42
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, age range in years 22-67
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Population, mean BMI, kg/m2 26
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, BMI Range, kg/m2 19-31
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline health status 18 subjects had close family history of colorectal cancer, 2 subjects had previously had colonic adenomas removed
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Gender (% male) ~55
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-type Combination/Mixture
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination wheat bran fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination resistant starch
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 1 (g) 11.6
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 2 (g) 1.8
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-Duration of intervention 3 weeks
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-how was the fiber administered? Combination Of Foods
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-type Combination/Mixture
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination wheat bran fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination resistant starch
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 1 (g) 11.2
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 2 (g) 21.6
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-Duration of intervention 3 weeks
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-how was the fiber administered? Combination Of Foods
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-type -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 1 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-Duration of intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-how was the fiber administered? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-type -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 1 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-Duration of intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-how was the fiber administered? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1- what was the comparator used in the intervention? matched control diet
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-dose WB: 0; RS:2-5
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-duration of comparator intervention 3 weeks
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-how was the comparator administered to participants? Combination Of Foods
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.