Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Colonic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates contributes to the second-meal effect.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Is this a fiber intervention study?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Colonic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates contributes to the second-meal effect.
Author Brighenti F., Benini L., Del Rio D., Casiraghi C., Pellegrini N., Scazzina F., Jenkins DJ., Vantini I.
Country Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43100 Parma, Italy. furio.brighenti@unipr.it
Year 2006
Numbers Pubmed ID: 16600933

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Fiber Database
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Year of Publication 2006
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country of Publication Italy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the study design? Randomized Controlled Trial (Crossover)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? unspecified
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study diet type acute feeding study
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Level of feeding control for dietary intervention All food provided
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample size 10
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a run-in period? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a washout period? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Did the administered fiber dose change over the course of the study? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the age of the population (categorical)? Adults (20+ Years)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, mean age in years 40
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, age range in years -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Population, mean BMI, kg/m2 23.7
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, BMI Range, kg/m2 -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline health status Healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Gender (% male) 80
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-type Combination/Mixture
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination amylose corn starch
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination cellulose
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 1 (g) 60
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 2 (g) 5
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-Duration of intervention 10 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-type -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 1 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-Duration of intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-how was the fiber administered? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-type -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 1 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-Duration of intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-how was the fiber administered? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-type -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 1 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-Duration of intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-how was the fiber administered? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1- what was the comparator used in the intervention? amylopectin corn starch (quickly and completely digestible, AMIOCA, National Starch & Chemicals SpA) with cellulose (nonfermentable purified from hazelnut shells (ALSO, Zelbio, Italy)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-dose 5 g cellulose (same as exposure group)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-duration of comparator intervention 10 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-how was the comparator administered to participants? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2- what was the comparator used in the intervention? amylopectin corn starch (quickly and completely digestible, AMIOCA, National Starch & Chemicals SpA) with lactulose (undigestible and highly fermentable disaccharide, INALCO, Milan, Italy)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-dose 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-duration of comparator intervention 10 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-how was the comparator administered to participants? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.