Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Effects of GI vs content of cereal fibre of the evening meal on glucose tolerance at a subsequent standardized breakfast.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Is this a fiber intervention study?
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Effects of GI vs content of cereal fibre of the evening meal on glucose tolerance at a subsequent standardized breakfast.
Author Nilsson A., Ostman E., Preston T., Björck I.
Country Applied Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Lund University, Sweden. anne.nilsson@inl.lth.se
Year 2008
Numbers Pubmed ID: 17522615

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Fiber Database
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Year of Publication 2008
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Country of Publication Sweden
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What was the study design? Randomized Controlled Trial (Crossover)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the study blinded? unspecified
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study diet type acute feeding study
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Level of feeding control for dietary intervention All food provided
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sample size 20
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a run-in period? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Is there a washout period? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Did the administered fiber dose change over the course of the study? No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
What is the age of the population (categorical)? Adults (20+ Years); Adolescents (12-19 Years)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, mean age in years NR
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, age range in years 19-30
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Population, mean BMI, kg/m2 22.1
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study population, BMI Range, kg/m2 -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Baseline health status Healthy
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Gender (% male) 50
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-type Dietary Fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 1 (g) 18.8 (9.8g barley DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-Duration of intervention ~13.5 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 1-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-type Dietary Fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 1 (g) 18.8 (9.8g barley DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-Duration of intervention ~13.5 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 2-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-type Dietary Fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 1 (g) 37.6 (19.6g barley DF)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-Duration of intervention ~13.5 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 3-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-type Barley Flour
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 1st fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-if combination was selected for fiber type, 2nd fiber type in combination -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 1 (g) (79.4g barley flour)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4- dose 2 (g) -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-Duration of intervention ~13.5 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Fiber 4-how was the fiber administered? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1- what was the comparator used in the intervention? matched white wheat bread
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-dose 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-duration of comparator intervention ~13.5 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 1-how was the comparator administered to participants? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2- what was the comparator used in the intervention? spaghetti enriched with oat dietary fiber
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-dose 0
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-duration of comparator intervention ~13.5 hours
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 2-how was the comparator administered to participants? Test Meal
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 3-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4- what was the comparator used in the intervention? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-dose -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-duration of comparator intervention -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comparator 4-how was the comparator administered to participants? -
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
No baseline characteristics have been defined for this extraction form.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Comments

Quality Dimensions
No quality dimensions were specified.

Quality Rating
No quality rating data was found.