Study Title and Description
Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study.
Key Questions Addressed
|2||What are the comparative benefits and harms of different nonpharmacological, noninvasive therapies for acute or chronic nonradicular low back pain, radicular low back pain, or spinal stenosis? (Including but not limited to interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise (various types), physical modalities (ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS], electrical muscle stimulation [EMS], interferential therapy [IFT], heat [various forms], and ice), traction tables/devices, back supports/bracing, spinal manipulation, various psychological therapies, acupuncture, massage therapy (various types), yoga, magnets, and low-level lasers)|
Primary Publication Information
|Title||Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study.|
|Author||Gatchel RJ., Polatin PB., Noe C., Gardea M., Pulliam C., Thompson J.|
|Country||Eugene McDermott Center for Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA. firstname.lastname@example.org|
Pubmed ID: 12611026
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain
Results & Comparisons
No Results found.