This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for care of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.



Key Questions Addressed
2 What are the comparative benefits and harms of different nonpharmacological, noninvasive therapies for acute or chronic nonradicular low back pain, radicular low back pain, or spinal stenosis? (Including but not limited to interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise (various types), physical modalities (ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS], electrical muscle stimulation [EMS], interferential therapy [IFT], heat [various forms], and ice), traction tables/devices, back supports/bracing, spinal manipulation, various psychological therapies, acupuncture, massage therapy (various types), yoga, magnets, and low-level lasers)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for care of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Author Haas M., Vavrek D., Peterson D., Polissar N., Neradilek MB.
Country Center for Outcomes Studies, University of Western States, 2700 NE 132nd Ave., Portland, OR 97230, USA. Electronic address: haasmitch@comcast.net.
Year 2014
Numbers Pubmed ID: 24139233

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain


Results & Comparisons

No Results found.