Study Title and Description
Comparison of spinal manipulation methods and usual medical care for acute and subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.
Key Questions Addressed
|2||What are the comparative benefits and harms of different nonpharmacological, noninvasive therapies for acute or chronic nonradicular low back pain, radicular low back pain, or spinal stenosis? (Including but not limited to interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise (various types), physical modalities (ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS], electrical muscle stimulation [EMS], interferential therapy [IFT], heat [various forms], and ice), traction tables/devices, back supports/bracing, spinal manipulation, various psychological therapies, acupuncture, massage therapy (various types), yoga, magnets, and low-level lasers)|
Primary Publication Information
|Title||Comparison of spinal manipulation methods and usual medical care for acute and subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.|
|Author||Schneider M., Haas M., Glick R., Stevans J., Landsittel D.|
|Country||*School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA †Center for Outcomes Studies, University of Western States, Portland, OR ‡Department of Psychiatry and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Center for Integrative Medicine at UPMC Shadyside, Pittsburgh, PA §School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and ¶Department of Medicine and Department of Biostatistics, Clinical & Translational Science Institute, Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.|
Pubmed ID: 25423308
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain
Results & Comparisons
No Results found.