This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

  • Home
  • Published Projects
  • Registries
Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

The clinical effectiveness of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator (IVS-04) midurethral slings: randomized trial.



Key Questions Addressed
1 Sling vs Comparator RCT outcomes (excluding AEs)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Post/View
2 Sling Adverse Events
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Post/View

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title The clinical effectiveness of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator (IVS-04) midurethral slings: randomized trial.
Author Rechberger T., Futyma K., Jankiewicz K., Adamiak A., Skorupski P.
Country Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Year 2009
Numbers Pubmed ID: 19285788
414 (internal)

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Sling vs Comparator RCT outcomes (excluding AEs)
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Country ... Other ... Poland
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Outcome Categories Reported Objective SUI
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Subjective SUI
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
OR outcomes/complications (not "AEs")
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Population (reason for surgery etc.) Symptomatic SUI
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Urodynamic SUI
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Intrinsic sphincter deficiency
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
RCT Comparison Category Retropubic vs. Obturator
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Multicenter No
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Institution Type Academic hospital
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Number of surgeons performing procedures Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Surgeons' Training Urogynecology
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Residents or fellows performing surgery? Unclear/Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Quality (overall) B (fair)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Overall Study Notes Compares retropubic and transobturator IVS (ie multifilamentous) slings
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Sponsor/Funding Industry
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |


Baseline Characteristics
Question Total Comments
AnswerFollow-up
No. Randomized No data entered.
Mean Age No data entered.
Post-Op Follow-Up Interval (Maximum) No data entered.



Results & Comparisons

No Results found.

Extraction Form: Sling Adverse Events
Arms
No arms have been defined in this extraction form.

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Follow-up time In-hospital or After discharge Is event serious? Reported definition of serious event Number affected Number at risk (analyzed) Difference between 2 slings (eg, OR/RR or %, with 95% CI) Reported P value between slings Comments