This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Persistence of urgency and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary symptoms after midurethral slings: a multivariate analysis.



Key Questions Addressed
2 Sling Adverse Events
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Persistence of urgency and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary symptoms after midurethral slings: a multivariate analysis.
Author Lee JK., Dwyer PL., Rosamilia A., Lim YN., Polyakov A., Stav K.
Country Department of Urogynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg. Vic., Australia. joseph.lee@southernhealth.org.au
Year 2011
Numbers Pubmed ID: 21392244
8928 (internal)

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Sling Adverse Events
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 both retropubic and transobturator polypropylene sling retropubic included TVT, advantage fit, Sparc transobturator included: Monarc, TVT-O
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Study Type Prospective Cohort (all received same sling)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Country Australia
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Other ... Israel
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sling Category Retropubic synthetic
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Obturator synthetic
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Multicenter? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Institution Type Academic hospital
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No. of Surgeons Performing the Procedures ... Other ...
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Surgeons' Training Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Residents or Fellows Performing the Surgery? Unclear/Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Adverse Event Ascertainment Active
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications system used? No / Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was a data safety monitoring board used? No / Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Sponsor/Funding Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comments (overall study) data was not differentiated according to sling type. study aim was to determine risk factors for persistence of urgency or UUI after midurethral sling placement.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Follow-up time In-hospital or After discharge Is event serious? Reported definition of serious event Number affected Number at risk (analyzed) Difference between 2 slings (eg, OR/RR or %, with 95% CI) Reported P value between slings Comments
both retropubic and transobturator polypropylene sling Organ injury in OR (urethra, bladder, bowel) bladder perforation at least 12 months 17 (2.3%) 754 ns
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total 12 (2.3%) 514