This is the old version of SRDR. The next, SRDRplus is available! Registration of your SRDRPlus account is free and approval is automatic. Click Here to register an SRDRPlus account.

  • Home
  • Published Projects
  • Registries
Advanced Search

Study Preview



Study Title and Description

Persistence of urgency and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary symptoms after midurethral slings: a multivariate analysis.



Key Questions Addressed
2 Sling Adverse Events
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
  • Post/View

Primary Publication Information
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
TitleData
Title Persistence of urgency and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary symptoms after midurethral slings: a multivariate analysis.
Author Lee JK., Dwyer PL., Rosamilia A., Lim YN., Polyakov A., Stav K.
Country Department of Urogynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg. Vic., Australia. joseph.lee@southernhealth.org.au
Year 2011
Numbers Pubmed ID: 21392244
8928 (internal)

Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.


Extraction Form: Sling Adverse Events
Arms
Number Title Description Comments
1 both retropubic and transobturator polypropylene sling retropubic included TVT, advantage fit, Sparc transobturator included: Monarc, TVT-O
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |

Design Details
Question... Follow Up Answer Follow-up Answer
Study Type Prospective Cohort (all received same sling)
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Country Australia
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Other ... Israel
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Sling Category Retropubic synthetic
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Obturator synthetic
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Multicenter? Yes
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Institution Type Academic hospital
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
No. of Surgeons Performing the Procedures ... Other ...
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Surgeons' Training Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Residents or Fellows Performing the Surgery? Unclear/Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Adverse Event Ascertainment Active
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications system used? No / Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Was a data safety monitoring board used? No / Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Study Sponsor/Funding Not reported
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Comments (overall study) data was not differentiated according to sling type. study aim was to determine risk factors for persistence of urgency or UUI after midurethral sling placement.
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |




Results & Comparisons

No Results found.
Adverse Events
Arm or Total Title Description Follow-up time In-hospital or After discharge Is event serious? Reported definition of serious event Number affected Number at risk (analyzed) Difference between 2 slings (eg, OR/RR or %, with 95% CI) Reported P value between slings Comments
both retropubic and transobturator polypropylene sling Organ injury in OR (urethra, bladder, bowel) bladder perforation at least 12 months 17 (2.3%) 754 ns
  • Comments Comments (
    0
    ) |
Total 12 (2.3%) 514