Study Title and Description
Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Key Questions Addressed
|1||1. What is the current research on the effectiveness of telehealth interventions? a. What telehealth interventions have been studied for effectiveness or harms? i. For which interventions are there systematic reviews available? b. What patient populations and conditions have been studied with telehealth interventions? c. What settings and situations have been studied with telehealth interventions? d. What primary outcomes have been studied with telehealth interventions? e. What study designs have been used in studies of the effectiveness of telehealth interventions?|
|2||2. What gaps exist in the current research? a. Which telehealth interventions identified by experts as currently relevant have no research evidence, or inadequate evidence? b. For which telehealth interventions are additional primary research studies needed to answer questions important to policy and practice, e.g., additional patient populations or outcome measures? c. For which telehealth interventions are there sufficient primary research studies that a new systematic review would add to current knowledge?|
Primary Publication Information
|Title||Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.|
|Author||Parthiban N., Esterman A., Mahajan R., Twomey DJ., Pathak RK., Lau DH., Roberts-Thomson KC., Young GD., Sanders P., Ganesan AN.|
|Country||Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Perdana University-Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Serdang, Malaysia.|
Pubmed ID: 25983009
Secondary Publication Information
There are currently no secondary publications defined for this study.
Extraction Form: Telehealth Included Systematic Reviews
Results & Comparisons
No Results found.